How we work

From request to report — and what comes next.

Fire protection inspections are only useful if the paperwork is complete, clear and easy to find a year later. This is how every visit works.

01

You request a quote

Tell us about your building and the systems you have. We follow up with next steps.

02

We inspect and test on site

Our technician works through the NFPA checklist for each system and records results, notes and photos in our app — even with no signal.

03

You receive a digital report

A PDF with NFPA references, photos, signatures and a quote for any deficiency found, ready to show an inspector.

04

We track what is next

Your history stays in one place, open deficiencies stay on our list until they are resolved, and we schedule your next visit.

Sample reports

See exactly what you receive.

Two reports generated by our app from fictional buildings and clearly marked SAMPLE. No real client data.

First page of a sample sprinkler inspection report

Fire sprinkler report

Annual wet-system inspection with a failed main drain test.

Open sample PDF
First page of a sample fire pump inspection report

Fire pump report

Annual flow test graded against the pump's nameplate curve.

Open sample PDF
Inside a report

What is in every report

An NFPA citation for every task

Each item on the checklist names the section of the standard it comes from.

Photo evidence

Photos attached to the findings they document, so nothing depends on memory.

Deficiencies with a suggested classification

For sprinkler systems, each failure is classified from NFPA 25's own deficiency table as a suggestion the technician can override, with a recommended action and a quote.

Test results, shown with their math

The main drain test and the fire pump flow test print the readings, the threshold and the pass/fail result.

Signatures

Signed by the technician and by your representative on site.

One history, kept for you

We keep a copy of every report, so a past visit is easy to find when an inspector asks.

Field intelligence

AI writes the draft. The technician decides.

Nothing is saved without a technician's review.

Recurring deficiencies

If the same issue shows up twice at the same building, our system flags it on its own — no comparing past visits by hand.

Inspection notes

In the field

Our technicians don't depend on a signal.

Basements and mechanical rooms rarely have good signal. Inspections are saved on the device and sync on their own when the connection returns — nothing is lost.

Offline queue

The retry waits a little longer each time (30s, 1m, 2m…) so it doesn't flood an unstable connection.

Want a report like this for your building?

Tell us about your systems and we will follow up with next steps.